This is very common question (and a good one!). It does seem paradoxical that zoologists need to take physical specimens from a species in order to ultimately preserve it, but that is very much the case! There are two parts to this answer. Firstly, why are specimens necessary in the first place, given 21st century technology, and secondly, why is taking specimens vital for species conservation

The reason taxonomic scientists must almost always take a specimen and deposit it in a collection is because it is impossible to be certain a species is new without having the actual, hard specimen to look at, and because hard specimens of all species in a group are vital for providing reference material to compare future potential new species against. Differences between species are often tiny, and require extremely detailed examination; far more than can be provided by digital photographs. They also need to be centralized in major collections in order to be accessible to scientists wanting to study these species. So normally there is no alternative to specimen collection. Calls have been made (including by Operation Wallacea scientists) to remove the criteria for a specimen where there is absolutely no doubt that a new species definitely is “new” from direct observations, but at least 99.9% of the time this just isn’t viable.

So, this raises the question of “is it worth collecting specimens if it means killing an individual of a new species as a holotype”? Which is a fair question. The answer to this, though, is most certainly “yes”. Taxonomic description is the first step towards effective conservation. If a species is not described, it cannot be given an IUCN Red List category, a CITIES appendix, or other conservation legislation. To all intents and purposes, a species doesn’t exist, legally speaking, until it is described, and thus cannot be effectively protected. So by taking a specimen just once, processes are put in place that can protect the entire population of that species indefinitely.

​So, while specimen-taking can seem distasteful to some, it is a 100% vital part of the taxonomic process, and the taxonomic process is 100% a part of species-level conservation

​And if you don’t describe a species properly, based on specimens, you can ultimately be endangering the entire population of that species.

View Research Expeditions  View Dissertation Expeditions  View School Expeditions
Wallace House, Old Bolingbroke, Spilsby, Lincolnshire PE23 4EX, UK
| +44 (0) 1790 763194 | info@opwall.com