
Back to index ecotourism studies
Back to index of 2002 research reports
THE SOCIO-CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF FURAKE VILLAGE AND THE IMPACTS OF ECOTOURISM
Introduction
Furake
is a small village of agar cultivators on the far side of Hoga Island from the
research base. The traditional community that live there have little or no
contact with eco-tourism visitors to Hoga Island.
The
research question is split into two subdivisions. The social- cultural structure
of the village will be explored, including the population size, age structure
and the number of families. The current economic activity in the village will be
examined, with the primary income sources and problems identified. Having
determined the general structure of the village the second part of the question
can be addressed.
In
gaining an understanding of the village’s culture, it allows for and
introduction into how the villagers in Furake can benefit economically from the
eco-tourism, limiting the adverse impacts on their culture.
Changes
that have occurred in the structure of the village due to eco-tourism in the
Wakatobi marine national park will be examined.
Julie
Roberts (University of London) and Julian Clifton (University of Portsmouth)
have previously investigated the impacts of eco-tourism in the Wakatobi marine
national park on Hoga Island. Their work included studies of the social,
economic, environmental and cultural effects from this tourism. The findings
were diverse, ranging from communication problems between the villagers and
Operation Wallacea volunteers, to the large benefits from Operation Wallacea
developments on the island, whose aims are to increase the involvement of the
locals with their conservation activities.
Aim
To
determine the socio-cultural and economic structure of Furake Village and how
Operation Wallacea's 2001 eco-tourism plan has affected the local community.
Objectives
Methodology
Interviews
will be carried out with a member of every hut in the village. Individual
households will be interviewed in a structured open-ended form. The interviewer
is in control of the interview, with the aid of a translator, through asking
questions that are highly structured and standardised. Open-ended questions will
also be asked allowing the respondent’s answers to be open with no constraints
or categories. Identical questions will be asked to every family, preventing any
bias through the free conversations.
The second technique in
order to evaluate economic structure will be a housing survey, which will
analyse each hut individually acting as an indicator of wealth with reference to
each family. ‘Straight observation’ will be the third technique in the data
collection. This will be carried out using a video camera. Thus, allowing for a
detached observation of the village.
In order to evaluate the
socio-cultural structure of the village, questions asked within the structured
interviews will be specified to giving an overall answer to this. This technique
will also be used to determine their involvement in Operation Wallacea’s
eco-tourism plan i.e.: to find out how many people are employed by Opwall, how
much they earn etc.
In order to examine the
eco-tourism proposal, structured individual interviews ill be carried out with
Operation Wallacea employees. An Irritation Index will also be handed out to 12
of the Operation Wallacea staff, in order to determine whether they feel that
Opwall has had a negative or positive impact upon the local community.
Finally, in order to
evaluate the future prospects for Furake village with reference to involvement
within Operation Wallacea, structured interviews will be carried out with Opwall
staff and other interviews will be carried out with other people working on the
island that have nothing to do with Opwall. Thus, allowing for a suitable
recommendation to be made for Furake Village with reference to new employment
opportunities.
Preliminary results
Due
to the size of this project, there has not yet been time to provide a detailed
analytical report of what exactly has been found. However, it has been found
that the people of Furake Village have not had much involvement in Opwall's
development with reference to the eco-tourism proposal. Therefore, there is
quite a lot of confusion as to what the eco-tourists are actually doing on the
island. However, the overall conclusion is that they are happy with us being ion
the island and they haven’t felt that culturally affected due to the distance
between Furake and the Opwall research base. They are happy for Operation
Wallace to continue with their work, just as long as they respect their beliefs
and cultural differences.
It was found that there
are only two people in the village employed by Opwall, one person weaves mats
and the other works as part of the dive staff. Although this number is small,
the majority of the village did specify interest in working for Operation
Wallacea i.e.: cooking in the kitchens, carrying water.
The general economic
activities in the village are seaweed farmers (agar agar). There are also a
number of fishermen and gardeners. The women generally help the males and act as
housewives. The older women weave mats.
With reference to the
social structure of the village, the majority of the locals come from Kaledupa,
and either live there permanently or as temporary residents staying in Furake
for employment opportunities. Generally, the families are inter-related up to
three generations living together or near each other. Many of the children are
at school in Kaledupa. Although the majority of the older population are
uneducated, and have only acquired basic skill which refer to the choice of
employment.
Culturally their
preference is the traditional way of life. They practice Islamic beliefs,
however this is more relaxed amongst the younger members of the local community
in comparison to the older people. Due to poor economic status, hours dedicated
to work tend to override the hours spent on prayer.
Report
A
dissertation entitled The socio-cultural and economic structure of Furake
village and the impacts of ecotourism will be produced by Harriet Inwood,
University of Sussex by March 2003.