
Back to index of mangrove, seagrass and reef flat studies
Back to index of 2002 research reports
DIVERSITY AND THERMAL
PHYSIOLOGY OF FISHES INHABITING MARGINAL HABITATS
Introduction and Background:
Shallow sand/seagrass flats, intertidal pools, and mangrove ponds are commonly found in close association with coral reef communities (Erftemeijer and Allen 1993). The term marginal habitat may be applied to these areas in that it accurately describes both their geographical location relative to the reef, as well as the harsh abiotic conditions each exhibits. The term might also be applicable to our overall understanding of the ecology of fishes living in these systems. Whereas a large body of literature documents ecology and distribution of fishes inhabiting coral reefs, the use of marginal habitats by reef fishes has been virtually overlooked (Ley et al. 1999; Kimani et al. 1996). A few studies have suggested that these areas may provide important nursery habitat (Bennett 1987; Chong et al. 1990; Vidy 2000; Laegdsgaard and Johnson 1995, 2001) or genetic (Bernardi et al. 2001; Horn et al. 1999) and nutrient reservoirs (Vega and Arreguin 2001; Laegdsgaard and Johnson 2001) for reef fishes but none quantify this relationship directly. Typically, these habitats differ markedly in water quality, spatial architecture, and community structure from the adjacent reef making it difficult to understand their ecology from previous reef research. As a result, no consensus exists as to the basic ecological function of marginal habitats or their relationship to coral reef fish communities (Nybakken 2001).
We
conducted preliminary investigations into the abiotic and biotic structure of
mangrove ponds, intertidal pools and shallow seagrass/sand flats surrounding
Hoga Island coral reefs. Specific
objectives of this research agenda were to 1) identify and catalogue the
distribution and diversity of marginal habitats and fishes inhabiting them, 2)
quantify physiological thermal tolerance limits of fishes and, 3) determine and
quantify to what degree abiotic habitat conditions limit coral reef fishes
living in marginal habits. Data
from these studies provide a better understanding of coral reef fish biology and
ecological-physiology of fishes living in harsh environments.
Methods:
Physical
characterization of marginal study sites
Students
trained in the use non-destructive techniques observed and collected fishes from
mangroves, sand/seagrass flats, and rockpools on the north end of Hoga Island.
General descriptions were made of each study site including overall dimensions,
depth profiles, bottom morphology, and water quality (pH, temperature, oxygen,
salinity and pH) using standard methods described by Nielsen and Johnson (1989).
Onset temperature loggers were used to monitor diel rates of water temperature
change (±0.1°C). Temperature (±0.1°C),
dissolved oxygen (±0.1 mg/l), salinity (±1.0‰), and pH (±0.1 unit) at each
site were monitored at low tide during both day and night.
Biodiversity and
tolerance experiments of study site fishes
Biodiversity
Measures – Fishes
were collected from study sites (away from the behavior experiments) using small
dip nets, and seines. Captured
fishes were identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible, measured to the
nearest 1mm and weighed to the nearest 0.1 g.
Up to 10 fish captured from each species were held in floating baskets
for later transport to the laboratory for use in temperature tolerance trials.
Fishes in excess of 10 were immediately released at the site of capture.
Species richness estimates were made from the collection data.
Determination of Thermal Tolerance – High-temperature tolerance of fishes collected
from each sample site (up to 10 fish) were estimated using the critical thermal
methodology (CTM) (Cox 1974; Becker and Genoway 1979; Palidino et al. 1980).
Briefly, a critical thermal maxima (CTMax) was determined by exposing
groups of 20 field-acclimatized fish to a constant rate of temperature increase
(~0.5°C/min) until loss of equilibrium (LOE) is observed.
The arithmetic mean of the collective endpoints was taken as the CTMax
for the population (Cox 1974).
Abiotic
conditions:
Biodiversity:
Reports:
A
paper entitled The thermal, saline and oxygen tolerances of fish living in
intertidal rock pool habitats in SE Sulawesi, will be prepared by Dr
Wayne Bennett, Nann Fangue and Jodie Rummer, University of West Florida by May
2003
References:
Becker, C. D. and R. G. Genoway. 1979. Evaluation
of the critical thermal maximum for determining thermal tolerance of freshwater
fish. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 4(3): 245─256.
Bennett, B. A. 1987. The rockpool fish community of
Koppie Alleen South Africa and an assessment of the importance of Cape Rock-pool
as nurseries for juvenile fish. South African Journal of Zoology 22(1):25-32.
Bernardi, G., S. J. Holbrook, and J. R. Schmitt.
2001. Gene flow at three spatial scales in a coral reef fish, the three-spot
dascyllus, Dascyllus trimaculatus. Marine Biology 138(3):457-465.
Chong, V. C., A. Sasekumar, M. U. C. Leh, and R. D.
Cruz. 1990. The fish and prawn communities of a Malaysian coastal mangrove
system with comparisons to adjacent mud flats and inshore waters. Estuarine,
Coastal, and Shelf Science 31(5):703-722.
Cox, D. K. 1974.
Effects of three heating rates on the critical thermal maximum of
bluegill. Pages 158-163 in J.
W. Gibbons and R. R. Sharitz, editors. Thermal
Ecology. National Technical
Information Service, CONF –730505, Springfield, Virginia.
Erftemeijer, P. L. A. and R. G. Allen. 1993. Fish
fauna of seagrass beds in south Sulawesi, Indonesia. Records of the Western
Australian Museum 16(2):269-277.
Fangue, N. A. and eight
co-authors. 2001.
Temperature and hypoxia tolerance of selected fishes from a hyperthermal
rockpool in the Dry Tortugas, with notes on diversity and behavior. Caribbean
Journal of Science. 37(2):In Press.
Horn, M. H., K. L. M. Martin, and M. A. Chotkowski,
eds. 1999. Intertidal fishes: Life in two worlds. San Diego: Academic Press.
Kimani, E. N., G. K. Mwatha, E. O. Wakwabi, J. M.
Ntiba, and B. K. Okoth. 1996. Fishes of a shallow tropical mangrove estuary,
Gazi, Kenya. Marine and Freshwater
Research 47(7):857-868.
Kramer, D. L.
1983. Aquatic surface
respiration in the fishes of Panama: distribution in relation to risk of
hypoxia. Environmental Biology of
Fishes 8:49-54.
Kramer, D. L. and M.
McClure. 1982. Aquatic surface respiration, a widespread adaptation to hypoxia
in tropical freshwater fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 7: 47-55.
Laegdsgaard, P. and C. Johnson. 2001. Why do
juvenile fish utilize mangrove habitats? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology
and Ecology 257(2):229-253.
Laegdsgaard, P. and C. R. Johnson. 1995. Mangrove
habitats as nurseries: Unique assemblages of juvenile fish in subtropical
mangroves in eastern Australia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 126(1-3):67-81.
Ley, J. A., C. C. McIvor, and C. L. Montague. 1999.
Fishes in mangrove prop-root habitats of northeastern Florida Bay: Distinct
assemblages across an estuarine gradient. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science
48(6):701-723.
Nielsen, L. A., and D. L. Johnson, eds.
1989. Fisheries Techniques.
American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
Nybakken, J. W., ed. 2001. Marine biology: An
ecological approach. 5th edition. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings.
Paladino, F. V., J. R. Spotila, J. P. Schubauer,
and K. T. Kowalski. 1980.
The critical thermal maximum; a technique used to elucidate physiological
stress and adaptation in fishes. Review
of Canadian Biology 39:115-122.
Prins, H. H. T. and J. Wind. 1992. Research for
nature conservation in South-east Asia. Biological Conservation 63(1):43-46.
Smale, M. A. and C. F. Rabeni. 1995. Hypoxia and
hyperthermia tolerances of headwater stream fishes. Transactions of the American
Fisheries Society 124(5): 698-710.
Vega, C. M. E and S. F. Sanchez. 2001. Energy flux
in a mangrove ecosystem from a coastal lagoon in Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico.
Ecological Modeling 137(2-3):119-133.
Vidy, G. 2000. Estuarine and mangrove systems and
the nursery concept: Which is which? The
case of the Sine Saloum system (Senegal). Wetlands Ecology and Management
8(1):37-51.
Appendix:
Table
1:
Species richness by site for shallow water habitats on the north end of Hoga
Island,
Indonesia.
|
Name |
Family |
Adult/Juvenile |
Transient/Resident |
CTMax
± SD |
n |
|
|
Dasyatidae |
|
|
|
|
|
Taeniura
lymma |
|
J |
T |
40.21±
0.39 |
5 |
|
Bluespotted
ribbontail ray |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Muraenidae |
|
|
|
|
|
Gymnothorax
sp. |
J |
T |
40.9
± 0.75 |
11 |
|
|
Moray
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gymnothorax
sp. |
? |
? |
40.35
± 0 |
1 |
|
|
"Medium
moray" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belonidae |
|
|
|
|
|
Strongylura
sp. ? |
J |
T |
40.09
± 1.62 |
8 |
|
|
Needlefish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fistulariidae |
|
|
|
|
|
Fistularia
commersonii |
J |
? |
n/a |
1 |
|
|
Smooth
flutemouth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hemiramphidae |
|
|
|
|
|
Hyporhamphus
sp. ? |
A |
T |
39.7
± 1.2 |
11 |
|
|
Halfbeak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syngnathidae |
|
|
|
|
|
Corythoichthys
intestinalis |
A |
R |
38.9
± 0.90 |
4 |
|
|
Scribbled
pipefish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corythoichthys
intestinalis |
J |
R |
39.4
± 1.24 |
11 |
|
|
Scribbled
pipefish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
? |
|
? |
? |
42.0
± 0 |
1 |
|
"seagrass
pipefish" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platycephalidae |
|
|
|
|
|
Thysanophrys
sp. |
? |
? |
40.6
± 0 |
1 |
|
|
"unknown
flathead" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scorpaenidae |
|
|
|
|
|
Scorpaenodes
sp. |
J |
T |
39.44
± 0.58 |
11 |
|
|
"Brown
scorpion fish" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apogonidae |
|
|
|
|
|
Apogon
melas |
|
J |
T |
39.7
± 2.55 |
2 |
|
Black
cardinalfish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apogon
savayensis |
J |
T |
39.4
± 1.17 |
10 |
|
|
Samoan
cardinalfish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fowleria
punctulata |
J |
T |
38.85
± 0.64 |
2 |
|
|
Peppered
cardinalfish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fowleria
variegata |
J |
T |
39.54
± 0.79 |
8 |
|
|
Variegated
cardinalfish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sphaeramia
orbicularis |
J |
T |
41.5
± 0 |
1 |
|
|
Orbiculate
cardinalfish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blenniidae |
|
|
|
|
|
Istiblennius
dussumieri |
A |
R |
n/a |
0 |
|
|
Streaky
rockskipper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Istiblennius
lineatus |
A |
R |
40.3
± 0 |
1 |
|
|
Lined
rockskipper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Istiblennius
gibbifrons |
A |
R |
39.8
± 0 |
1 |
|
|
Picture
rockskipper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salarias
sp.? |
|
A |
R |
40.65
± 0.52 |
11 |
|
"Mottled
combtooth blenny" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||