Back to index of reef fish studies

Back to index of 2002 research reports

ABUNDANCE AND DIVERSITY OF CHAETONTIDAE IN RESPONSE TO VARIATION IN CORAL COVER

Introduction

Butterflyfish (family Chaetodontidae) are commonly used as an indicator species of coral health. Indicator species can be used to detect low-level changes in the coral reef habitat, and act as a warning system for stress within this ecosystem. Commonly used indicator species of Chaetodont include those which are obligate corallivores e.g. C.trifasciatus.  Correlations have been found between the abundance and diversity of these species and coral abundance and diversity.  Crosby and Reese (1996) stated “the butterflyfish indicator method is sensitive to changing conditions on the reef and should provide an “early warning” that a change is occurring. This may provide enough time for remedial actions to be taken before entire coral reef habitats are lost.”

The distribution of Chaetodonts on coral reefs has been linked to the amount of live coral cover (Bell & Galzin,1984; Bouchon-Navaro,1985; Hourigan,1988).  Aswell as other factors including topographic complexity, food availability, current flow and the availability of hiding places.

 

Aims

1.       Test for variation in the abundance and diversity of Chaetodont species in response to variation in coral cover.

2.       Test whether using a restricted range of Chaetodont species e.g. strong corallivores gives a better correlation with habitat variables than using total counts.

 

Objectives

1.      To identify the species of butterflyfish present within the sampling area  

2.      To identify the numbers of each species present within the sampling area

3.      To record the level of coral cover present along each transect line within the sampling area

 

Methodology

Eight sites were selected both inside and outside the No Fishing Zone:

 

Transect lines were set up along the reef crest, each line being 50m in length and at a depth of 3m below the reef crest. For each of these sites three transects were laid, and these replicates were surveyed a total of three times, giving a total of three benthic surveys and nine Chaetodont surveys for each site. There was a gap of at least 5m between each of the replicates to ensure separation, with each 50m Chaetodont survey taking approximately 15 to 20 minutes to complete, and each 50m benthic survey taking approximately 40 minutes to complete. When each transect line was laid on the reef, they were left for approximately 10 minutes to allow the fish to resume normal behaviour. Surveys were completed between 9AM and 5PM to allow for diurnal movement of Chaetodonts.

Preliminary Results

As yet, no analysis has been carried out on the data that has been collected over the last eight weeks; however, some interesting observations have been made. It has been noted, for example, that in Sampela where the reef is exceptionally degraded there is still a very high diversity of chaetodonts, although the abundance remains lower in these sites.

Multivariate Analysis e.g. PRIMER will be used to correlate abundance and diversity of Chaetodonts with habitat variables e.g. live coral cover. Tests such as the T-test and ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) can be used to look at site differences.  

Report

A dissertation entitled Abundance and diversity of Chaetondontidae with variations in coral cover will be produced by Louise Withecombe, University of Plymouth by April 2003.