|
|
|
About us > What is Opwall? > Global Research and Conservation
Strategy
Global Research and Conservation
Management Strategy
The vast majority of science programmes that deliver key
research outcomes are characterised by short term funding with
restricted aims and biogeographical ranges. Long-term projects
covering large biogeographical scales and that incorporate more
than one ecosystem are rare. The Operation Wallacea programme
provides the opportunity to consider science and conservation of
key ecosystems from a global perspective. Opwall draws upon researchers from a wide range of different
disciplines and academic institutions to address major issues
related to the sustainable management and conservation of some
of the world's most diverse but threatened environments.
A global research and conservation strategy
has been developed and is applied in four stages at each of the
sites. This includes an initial assessment of the biological
value of the site (Stage 1). If the site is accepted into the Opwall
programme an ecosystem monitoring programme is
established to determine the direction of change (Stage 2). If
this reveals a continuing decline a programme for
monitoring socio-economic change in adjacent communities is
established to determine how these communities interact with the
study site (Stage 3). Once data from Stage 2 and Stage 3 are
obtained funding applications are submitted to establish a best
practice example of conservation management and the success of
these programmes are then monitored (Stage 4). There is can be
considerable overlap between these stages. Stage 1 projects can
still be running at the same time as a Stage 4 programme in
order to enhance understanding of the ecosystem
requirements for target species or to add to the overall species
lists for previously un-worked taxa.
Stage 1: Assessing
ecosystem diversity and function
The first stage at a new site is to determine the relative
biodiversity value of the site to determine the protection
requirements, or if it is already protected whether it will make a
valuable long term study site for the Opwall
research teams. In order to assess the importance of a site,
taxonomic groups that have been studied in similar habitats elsewhere in the region are surveyed,
so the relative value of the site can be assessed.
Examples of this type of survey include the atlas distributional
surveys in the St Katherine Protectorate in Egypt and the coral
reef surveys in Cuba and Mozambique. However, even after
determination of the relative value of a site, additional data
on other taxonomic groups are added as different specialists
join the programmes. Examples of this type of
survey include the sponge surveys in the Wakatobi National Park,
Indonesia, the continuing woody plant surveys of the Cusuco
cloud forest National Park in Honduras, and bird surveys of the
Pacaya Samiria National Park in Peru. These data add to the
species diversity knowledge of the site, but understanding the
ecosystem requirements of key species is an equally important
element of study. Examples of this type of study are the habitat
and behaviour studies of primates such as macaques in Indonesia,
mantled howler monkeys in Honduras and red uakari monkeys in
Peru, civet ecology studies in the Lambusango forests,
Indonesia, various resource partitioning studies of coral reef
fish and the causation of patch reef diversity in the Wakatobi
National Park in Indonesia. Understanding the connectivity of
various ecosystems is another part of this research theme and is
best exemplified by the use of mangrove, seagrass and coral reef
habitats by various fish species in the Caribbean and
Indo-Pacific.
Stage 2: Monitoring
ecosystem change
Once a site has been identified as worthy of inclusion as a long
term study area for the Operation Wallacea research teams, a
monitoring programme for the study site is established so
changes in the ecosystems can be assessed. Examples of these
studies include the large scale forest structure and faunal
studies in the Lambusango forest in Indonesia and the Cusuco
National Park in Honduras and the annual surveys of coral,
invertebrates and fish on a range of transects in the Wakatobi
National Park, Indonesia, Utila and Cayos Cochinos Islands in
Honduras. These surveys often lead to more detailed studies of
aspects of the ecosystem where there appears to be an
anthropogenic impact. Examples of these studies include
monitoring of artisanal fisheries in the Wakatobi Marine
National Park, Indonesia; stable isotope surveys to determine
sources of water quality impacts on the reefs of Utila and Cayos
Cochinos Islands in Honduras, levels of hunting pressure on
large mammals, caiman and river turtles in the Lago Preto and
Pacaya Samiria reserves in the Amazon, Peru. Monitoring
population levels of keystone species in the ecosystems is also
an important element of these monitoring programmes and examples
of these studies include the anoa surveys in the Lambusango
forests in Indonesia, Baird's tapir surveys in Cusuco
National Park in Honduras, and the primate, macaw and dolphin population
studies in the Amazon, Peru.
Stage 3: Monitoring
socio-economic change
Conservation of the sites included in the Operation Wallacea
programme requires the co-operation of adjacent communities
and data on how these communities interact with the study sites.
Examples of this type of study include the surveys of household
income, attitudes to the adjacent protected area and levels of
compliance with the protected area's rules in the Lambusango
forest, Indonesia, the Cusuco National Park and the Cayos
Cochinos Marine protected Area in Honduras. Stage 3 studies are
launched once the decision has been made that there are
sufficient biological data and knowledge about the ecosystems to
complete a detailed funding application to support the
establishment of a best practice example of conservation
management in the study area.
Stage 4: Establishing and monitoring the
effectiveness of conservation management programmes
The final stage is when international funding is received to
establish a best practice conservation management programme.
This is directed through the
Operation Wallacea Trust, a UK
registered charity, which oversees the disbursement of the funds
to various in country organisations to implement the management
programme. The Opwall survey programme continues
with the biodiversity and socio-economic performance monitoring
programme established in Stages 2 and 3. Volunteers on this
project then have the opportunity to work alongside staff from
other international and national organisations involved in the
management programme implementation. The Lambusango and Kaledupa
survey programmes in Indonesia fall into this category, as does
the monitoring programme in the rainforests of the Peruvian
Amazon. These surveys also examine the effectiveness of existing
conservation management programmes such as the studies being
completed in the Kruger National Park and in the Pongola and Welgevonden Reserves in South Africa.
Community benefits
Throughout these four stages
of development, an additional objective of the programme is to
develop financial benefits to local communities as a result of
protecting the studied areas. Wherever possible the
expeditions are organised in close co-operation with the local
communities and substantial benefits accrue to those communities
through providing accommodation, food, transport, and manpower. In
addition to the direct economic input from the expeditions
emphasis is placed on the development of businesses that can
provide alternative incomes to local communities e.g. coral
growing for the aquarists market in Kaledupa, Wildlife
Conservation Product prices for cashews, chocolate and coffee in
Indonesia and Honduras. |
|
|